History of Welfare in Ireland: Poor Law and Beveridge Report

History of Welfare in Ireland: Poor Law and Beveridge Report This paper will briefly outline the development of social service provision in Ireland from 1922 to the present day, highlighting several factors such as the Poor Law (1598-1948) and The Beveridge Report (1942) that have played a significant role in the shaping of this welfare approach known as ‘residual welfare’. For a variety of reasons such as economic growth, different political parties and differing welfare system options, UK’s welfare state has gained much crisis discussion. Residual welfare is not a universal welfare model; rather it is a system aimed at providing provision for those specific individuals in society that need and fit certain criteria, generally defined as ‘the poor’. Within residual welfare systems, welfare provision is considered to be a safety net, available only to those defined within the policy context as most in need, usually when the market or family has failed. According to Titmuss’ framework from 1974, Britain represents the ‘individual welfare system’ where there is a limited function of state welfare. Universal welfare is based upon the premise that welfare services are accessible to everyone, usually determined on the basis of citizenship within a nation state. The difficulty with this system is that it can be costly. Therefore, a residual system is aiming to reduce those costs by apportioning provisions to only those who need them. (Mau 2001, pp. 5-9; Titmuss, R 1974, p.20). It is helpful to acknowledge that welfare is an ambiguous term which can cause discrepancies between individuals and agencies when looking at welfare needs and services. Some individuals expect a return for any contribution they make to a social system whereas other are content with knowing the system is there for those that need it and that might not necessarily include themself. There is a strong belief that the system should be a premium-benefit one, where the current financiers will one day be the future users. It can also open the question of who it should be available to, how long, should they pay and are they deserving? Welfare is generally used in three main senses, the first referring to a person’s refers to general well-being. Of course, well-being is another term that can mean different things to different people. From a sociological framework, it generally means having access to basic needs such as shelter and food, but it does go beyond simply needs; to achieve we ll being, people must have choices, and the scope to choose personal goals and ambitions. Welfare also refers to the range of services available to look after people in a number of conditions throughout their life, for example childhood, sickness and old age. (Mau 2001, pp. 4-6). Historically, the model of welfare which has been the most dominant model in English-speaking countries is known as ‘residual welfare’ which stemmed from Poor Law (1598-1948). Poor Law was first implemented in 1598 and continued until 1948. This Elizabethan method aimed at providing three central aspects, a compulsory poor rate, the creation of overseers of relief and the provision for setting the poor on work. It provided discretionary payments to individuals assessed as being in need. It was a harsh law aimed at providing the bare minimum an individual would need to survive in the aim that people would rely upon it for existence, creating a dependence upon social security which would result in a negative image of public support. It aimed to control and discipline the poor and in some ways punch by providing support that was below the lowest wage, a principle known as ‘lowest eligibility’. This law continued to be important in the delivery of many means-tes ted benefits until the last two decades of the twentieth century. (Alcock 2003, p. 24-8; Williams 1989, pp. 150-4). Following on this movement in Britain’s welfare system, Mau (2001) stated that on some levels, a welfare state can help to repair social divisions or at least ‘to mitigate social inequalities; not only in terms of material inequalities, but also in ideological and political terms.’ Thus the Beveridge Report from 1942 proposed a system of National Insurance, based on three assumptions, family allowances, a national health service, and lastly full employment. It was written by Sir William Beveridge, a highly respected economist and expert on unemployment problems. Opinion polls reported that the majority of the British public welcomed the reports findings and wished to see them implemented as quickly as possible, seemingly relieved at the possibility of a less harsh social system than the Poor Law. The first post-war election, in June 1945, resulted in a victory for the Labour Party, devout promoters of the Beveridge Report. It quickly became the blueprint for the m odern British welfare state, even being referred to as by any measure a landmark. (Alcock 2003, p. 24-8; Williams 1989, pp. 150-4; Historic Figures. William Beveridge, 23rd February 2007). The Beveridge Report aimed to provide a expansive system of social insurance for an individuals whole life. Here we have the induction of the ‘residual model’ that still exists to a degree in Ireland. It proposed that all working people should pay a weekly contribution to the state, in other words, tax. In return, benefits would be paid to the unemployed, the sick, the retired and the widowed, those who needed it. Beveridge wanted to ensure that there was an acceptable minimum standard of living in Britain below which nobody fell, very different to the aims of Poor Law. (Alcock 2003, p. 6; Mau 2001, p. 3; Schifferes, S, 26 July 2005). Changes in the welfare system have continued to the present day, post 1948, the key elements of Irelands welfare state have remained focused upon social security, health, housing, education and children. The Welfare State was not intended to respond to poverty; that was what the Poor Law had aimed to, rather its main purpose was to encourage the provision of the social services on the same basis as the public services, including medical services, roads, libraries, local community needs. In other words, it aimed to create an institutional model of welfare. (Mau 2001, pp. 3-5; ). This paper has aimed to briefly illustrate the changes in Ireland’s welfare system highlighting several factors such as the Poor Law (1598-1948) and The Beveridge Report (1942) that have played a significant role in the shaping of this welfare approach known as ‘residual welfare’, a system, aimed to be available if and when an individual needs its services.The development and implication of welfare provision in Britain is a lengthy and complicated issue, therefore this paper aimed to provide a brief summary of some of the key events leading to its present situation known as a ‘residual welfare system’. Bibliography Alcock, P. 2003. 2nd Edition. Social Policy in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire. Esping-Anderson, G 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity Press, Oxford. Mau, S 2001. Patterns of Popular Support for the Welfare State. A Comparison of the United Kingdom and Germany. Social Research Center, Berlin. Offe, C 1987. Democracy against the Welfare State? Structural Foundations of Neoconservative Political Opportunities. In Political Theory, Vol.15, No 4, November, pp. 501-537). Page, R Silburn, R 1999. British Social Welfare in the Twentieth Century. St Martin’s Press Inc, Hampshire. Titmuss, R.M. 1974. Social Policy. Allen and Unwin, London. Williams, F 1989. Social Policy. A Critical Introduction. Polity Press, Cambridge. bbc.cok.uk, 2007, Historic Figures. William Beveridge (1879 1963), BBC Homepage 23rd February, retrieved 23rd February 2007 from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/beveridge_william.shtml. Schifferes, S 2005, Britains long road to the welfare state, BBC News 26 July, retrieved 23rd February 2007 from:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4696391.stm. Investigation: Personal Technology Mediated Communication Investigation: Personal Technology Mediated Communication Table of Contents List of abbreviations List of extracts List of figures 1Introduction 2Analysis 2.1Choice of mode 2.1.1Cost 2.1.2Degree of comfort 2.1.3Medium uniqueness 2.1.4Formality 2.1.5Peer influence 2.1.6Immediacy 2.1.7Intertextuality Retrievability Navigability 2.1.8Multifunction 2.1.9Lack of desire for self-disclosure 2.2Nature of language used 2.2.1Language background 2.2.2Keyboard affordance 2.2.3Intimacy level 2.2.4Cultural value 2.3Semiotic resources 2.3.1Numbering, paragraphing, colouring textual specification 2.3.2Emoji, stickers, symbol 2.3.3Tagging function 2.3.4Telepresence indicators 2.4Interweaving of media in extended interactions 2.4.1Postponement 2.4.2Confidentiality/Secrecy 2.4.3Spatial constrain 2.4.4Clarification 2.4.5Instant feature and directive influence 3Conclusion References FtF face-to-face FB Facebook FM Facebook Messenger Extract 1 Extract 2 Extract 3 Extract 4 Extract 5 Extract 6 Extract 7 Extract 8 Extract 9 Extract 10 Extract 11 Extract 12 Figure 1 Emoji Figure 2 Sticker MimYam Figure 4 Green dot Figure 5 Group conversation Figure 6 Message seen Communication in todays world is profoundly affected by technological features and users perceived of their usage. Multimodal technological resources facilitate interaction beyond temporal and spatial distance with various participation modes (Barton Lee, 2013, p. 29), also correlate with users medium choice, behaviour and psychology. In technology-mediated communication, choice of mode is decided by the setting, selecting strategy and evaluating outcome of the communication (Joinson, 2003, p. 125), or by participants perceived affordances of the media (Herring Demarest, 2011, pp. 19-21). For instance, text can be preferred over more novel medium like audio or video thanks to its richer communication markers, asynchronicity and low level of self-consciousness. In a paper by Laursen (2012, pp. 87-97), the shift from text message to call is attributed to synchronicity, immediacy, complex information processing, and chance for negotiation. Call also denotes some degree of intimacy involving simultaneous checking of relationship status through breath, pitch or pauses in oral exchange. Innovation in communication technology also entails more types of semiosis for interaction. Hutchby (2001, p. 96) points out telephone conversation has a distinct means of summon not by human oral production but by the sound of the ring which signals an upcoming call that the other end of the line will pick up and respond. Later when Internet appears, it enables greater access to information thanks to intertextual hyperlinks or expression of emotions via emoticons (Barton Lee, 2013, p. 29). Added to this, (Lamy, 2006, p. 388) lists clicking a button to denote conversation ended, retaining of message after the interactants have left the chat platform, also the help of telepresence indicators like the faded name or photo. Vandergriff (2013, pp. 8-10) focuses on the use of CMC cues in which the use of multiple exclamation mark could express assertiveness or intensified disagreement, smiley icons indicate a dispreference of an action, or turn ellipsis is understood as mitigated disappro val or openness for conversation expansion. Additionally, technology also influences our language and our self-expression. Hutchby (2001, p. 86) concerns the lack of physical context cue that makes telephone conversations normally involve identification process at the beginning of the conversation. In online language analysis, Barton and Lee (2013, p. 69) and Herring and Demarest (2011, p. 4) mention gender in which male users tend use more impersonal expression and longer messages whereas female prefer to use the first person and express more feelings. Moreover, Barton and Lee (2013: 68-69) claim that the dynamics and control over our online self-disclosure involve choosing which part of and how our identities to be revealed and accordingly present a less or more associative image in comparison to our offline identities. This regulates our online writing language and entails adjustment of language to whom we could expected or imagined. Regarding behaviour and psychology, Joinson (2003) proposes five key dimensions of tool-behaviour relationship involves synchronicity, the cues transmitted, bandwidth and cost constraints, level of anonymity, and sender-recipient exclusivity. In CMC, people may also tend to follow the hyperpersonal model (Walther et al., 2015, pp. 13-14) whereby they exaggerate perceived reality about the other interactants and use it to inform their future actions. Devices affordances may cause users to be under pressure to be constantly available for being contacted (Cumiskey Ling, 2015, p. 231). Also, online psychology and behaviour involves individual self-disclosure where people desire to express themselves (Walther et al., 2015) and act as the source of information (Sundair et al., 2015), whereas includes deindividuation in which individual identity is partially or fully hidden (Walther et al., 2015, p.11) or self-awareness is reduced to merge in online social norms (Spears Postmes, 2015, p. 25). In a nutshell, a number of aspects related to technology-mediated communication have been investigated and is being studied in response to the rapid development of technological applications and diverse users perceived affordances. The following part, hence, will dedicate to analyse my own use of technology for communication in the light of the reviewed studies, and hopefully brings out some contributive findings. Devices involved in this analysis were tablet, mobile phone and computer, and the tablet also has a SIM card reader so it can act as a mobile phone. Soft medium analysed included Google Email and online data cloud, Facebook (FB), Facebook Messenger (FM) a separate application for sending messaging or calling among FB users, and Skype another application for sending text messages and making calls. All these applications are Internet-based and free of charge. 2.1 Choice of mode 2.1.1 Cost Cost is the first-and-foremost factor that manipulates my communication mode choice. The more the medium costs, the less likely it is to be chosen. Though the SIM card enabling domestic and international calls, mobile phone was not favoured since phone service always charged money and the fee would be burgeoned for overseas interaction. Consequently, I only employed free services like email to contact professors or Skype and FB to contact relatives and friends though all of them are approachable on telephone line. I once used mobile phone to contact an overseas travel agency in the US because their line was toll-free, so I only had to pay a minimal amount of money for international dialling but I could talk on the phone as long as I want since the call fee was paid by the travel agency. 2.1.2 Degree of comfort Thanks to its light weight mobility and availability, Tablet was more preferred with higher comfort degree over computer with heavier weight and requiring more acts like starting, shutting down or plugging charger. Tablet was more mobile to carry along to all places such as desk, bed, classroom and in motion like walking on the street. The degree of comfort was also true to the choice of soft medium where none of my communication involved video sharing or video calling. This is explained by my preference for modes with low level of self-consciousness like texting or calling where I could comfortably maintain interaction without being distracted by my reflection or worrying about my appearance on the screen. 2.1.3 Medium uniqueness Choice of mode was restrained by the other entity and this made me stick to only one medium. For instance, brands or organizations websites all offer visitors to leave their emails so that new reduction/sales or upcoming events would be sent to them automatically, and the sole medium used to subscribe was email. In another case of citizen services, when I wanted to book a visa appointment via an Embassy, the office only allowed booking via mobile phone in which visitors dial the provided number to provide personal information and receive confirmed schedule by an officer. Besides, some of my addressees only provide me their email or their FB so email or FM were the sole channels to communicate with them and no other choice of medium could be employed. 2.1.4 Formality Formality of the message and the interaction itself also decides the modes of communication. For formal communication like asking for professors supervision, excusing absence in a class session or job application, email would be a better choice. The email interface itself is more neutral and professional with separate spaces for typing subjects and contents, office font sizes, bullet and numbering, etc. to present the information in a well-organized and formal format. Those functions are not provided by the instant messaging, mobile phone SMS or calling. For informal talks like gossiping about non-academic problems, email may not be as suitable as other texting or chatting applications that allow instant response. 2.1.5 Peer influence The medium I choose was also affected by the technology that the other entities use. If the addressees encounter some technical or personal problems, I accordingly opt for the medium that best works on their device and suit their condition. For example, my mothers eyes are far-sighted so its hard for her to navigate where to click to see inbox or to send text in emailing and texting. For that reason, I only used voice chatting or video calling rather than texting when communicating with her. My father, more interestingly, does not know how to use any smart devices and could only be approached by classic media like SMS or phone calling, so whenever I wanted to contact him phone-calling is my only resort. 2.1.6 Immediacy Regarding the immediacy in communication, email seems to be inferior to other applications like mobile phone, Skype or FM. Email could take long duration to receive a response and they are at risk of being filtered as spam or junk by the email account. If the recipient does not check their spam box, there is likelihood that my email never reaches them. There is also another case when sending emails to organizations/offices and my email is not instantly checked and replied until the next day because it has to queue in a line of many other enquiries sent to the offices. And of course it is very awkward and time-consuming when having an informal and close-knit chat with friends in which me and my friends keep clicking and sending emails while we can choose to text each other using FM or Skype. Therefore, in case I need an immediate response for my communication, I prefer calling via mobile phone (if the information is urgent) or Skype or texting with FM. 2.1.7 Intertextuality Retrievability Navigability Obviously, text mode normally allows better information retrieval than call mode, and this function is more enhanced in CMC where external sources of information exchanged in interaction could be accessed by all interactants and be easily navigated with one click even when the conversation has ended. For example, functions incorporated in Google email enables searching sent or received mails through typing keywords and provides capacity to upload audio, video and documents easily shared with other people who have Google account just by one click. Or in another case when I had a group chat discussing accommodation booking, we decided to type because it was easier to refer to different options by pasting the links or screen captures into the chatting box and the whole group could see exactly which hostel was being considered. Those options were retained forever in the box chat so we could retrieve them several days/months later. 2.1.8 Multifunction Sometimes the consideration of hard medium between computer or Tablet is decided by the affordances of the device itself, and it is obscure that computer is more multifunctional than the other counterpart. Computer allows multi-window operating at the same time while my Tablet does not, also many acts are easier to be done on bigger screen and keyboards rather than on touch device, e.g long text processing. Multifunctional features also applied for my choice of soft medium and this could be illustrated in the comparison between email and IM via FM or Skype. Emails affordances are superior with possibility to forward a large amount of information, to format the text in highlighted forms with colouring, large font size, or underlining, or to send emails to different recipients simultaneously without letting them know about each other (Bcc). FM or Skype undeniably has not included all those functions, they do not have a search box to type in keywords, no data cloud, no font size or bull et options, and previous messages are time-consuming to retrieve. However, their function to track whether the recipient has seen their messages made them surpass email in some cases. 2.1.9 Lack of desire for self-disclosure My choice of medium, or to be exact, the functions of medium was affected by my low desire for self-expression in which I use FB but hardly employed multimodal resources for posting, sharing, surfing, hashtag, or commenting. I have little demand for self-disclosure so I did not share the things I read, the feelings I have or the events/places I had been to on my FB page. All my interactions via FB channel were instant messaging initiated by the need to update situation of relatives and friends in my home country or exchange information about a particular problem. Even though I am a member of some FB group, I still sent private message to other members when they post a question that I can help instead of publicly typing my answer in the comment box. 2.2 Nature of language used 2.2.1 Language background The majority of my interaction with friends or relatives is translingual since we have multilingual background. Our exchange has frequent code-switching between Vietnamese and English, or in some cases three languages when I use Thai to chat with friends who know Thai. An ample evidence for this could be seen in the following extract between me and other two friends discussing about booking a room for a cruise trip (English words are highlighted in the left column): Extract 1 Anh the thoi xong chac cho ten + passport de dang ky la xong Thao in the worst case thà ¬ phà ²ng 8107 cÃ…Â ©ng Ä‘Æ °Ãƒ ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ £c ha Anh uhh worst case cung dc re nhung tren web con nhieu lam, hon chuc phong co, ko lo Phuong Thà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¿ là   chà ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœt xog Ä‘Ã ºng hok Chà ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœt là ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¡i bn ng Thao 4 ng mail sent TrÆ °a mai chÆ °a rep thà ¬ e gà ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ i Ä‘ià ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ ¡n cho à ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ ¢ng luà ´n Anh thats all then perhaps we give (him) our names and passport to register Thao in the worst case, is room 8107 OK? Anh Yes, that worst case is OK. cheap But dont worry, the web stills show a lot of spare rooms, more than ten of them. Phuong Thats finalized right? In the end how many people? Thao 4 people mail sent If he does not rep the mail until next noon, I will call him. 2.2.2 Keyboard affordance Languages involved in my conversations are used in customized form due to keyboard. For instance, some of my Vietnamese friends did not have keyboard allowing typing tone markers or special Vietnamese characters, so their message were written in reduced Vietnamese. Though in some rare occasion did this obstruct our communication, the conversation generally went smooth because all interactants have Vietnamese as mother-tounge. Take the message from the following extract as an illustration, the friend that customized language is Anh: Extract 2 Original message Standard language Translated message Anh the thoi xong chac cho ten + passport de dang ky la xong Anh thà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¿ thà ´i xong chà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¯c cho tà ªn + passport Ä‘Ã ¡Ã‚ »Ã†â€™ đăng kà ½ là   xong Anh thats all then perhaps we give (him) our names and passport to register Also due to keyboards lacking special characters, some language not using Latin alphabet must be transliterated and in my case is Thai. There was Thai virtual keyboard but it took time and may impede understanding so it was not employed: Extract 3 Original message Standard language Translated message Thao Uh hihi tks quà ¢n nhà ¬u Hong May pà ªn ray krub Thao Uh hihi tks quà ¢n nhà ¬u Hong à  Ã‚ ¹Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ãƒ  Ã‚ ¸Ã‚ ¡Ãƒ  Ã‚ ¹Ã‹â€ Ãƒ  Ã‚ ¹Ã¢â€š ¬Ãƒ  Ã‚ ¸Ã¢â‚¬ ºÃƒ  Ã‚ ¹Ã¢â‚¬ ¡Ãƒ  Ã‚ ¸Ã¢â€ž ¢Ãƒ  Ã‚ ¹Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ãƒ  Ã‚ ¸Ã‚ £Ãƒ  Ã‚ ¸Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ãƒ  Ã‚ ¸Ã‚ £Ãƒ  Ã‚ ¸Ã‚ ±Ãƒ  Ã‚ ¸Ã… ¡ Thao Yeah hihi thanks a lot Hong Youre welcome! 2.2.3 Intimacy level Intimacy is the key factor shaping the choice of language in all my communications, and the level of formality in language is accordingly adjusted. Informal language could be detected via the use and density of colloquial, emoji, stickers, slangs, swear words. When talking with close friends, I used these informal expressions uncontrollably or rampantly, but I was more conscious and limit the use of them when interacting with normal friends, which are exemplified in the following extracts: Extract 1: with close friends (me, Trung and Ngoc). Ngoc is talking about her disgust when coming across her ex-boyfriends photos on Facebook. The language is flooded with swear word, exclamation, emoji, emphatic form like capitalisation and repetition of letters: Extract 4 Thao mà  y cà ³ cà ¢u thà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ §n chà º gà ¬ k mà ¡Ã‚ »-i là ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ §n là ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¡nh gà ¡y thà ¬ là ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ©m nhà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ©m Ngoc Ä‘Ã ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ £t trc Ä‘Ã £ block hà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¿t tà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¥t cà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ £ mà ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ i thà ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ © mà ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ i ngÆ °Ãƒ ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ i thà ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬Å"i thà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¿ Ä‘ nà  o và ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ «n sà ³t à ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœi già ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ £i Æ ¡i cà ³ hà ´m thà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¿ nà  o xem Ä‘c dm cà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ £ nà ³ cà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ £ ny mà ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ ºi dm Ä‘i phÆ °Ãƒ ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ £t à ´i Quoc Ngoc m phà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ £i hià ¡Ã‚ »Ã†â€™u là   cà ¡i nhà ³m bà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¡n là ¬n cà ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ §a nà ³ chuyà ªn Ä‘i phÆ °Ãƒ ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ £t và   chà ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ ¥p à ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ £nh và   ăn là ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ©u và   chà ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ ¥p à ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ £nh (net uà ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœc king) nà ªn dm nhià ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ u à ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ £nh vc ra Cà ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ ¨U TÔI Và ¡Ã‚ »Ã… ¡I :((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( Thao Do you have any incantation whenever feeling disgusted? Ngoc I blocked all things and all people related to him but I still missed out some photos Oh my god Fuck it the other day I saw he and his new girlfriend fucking went trekking. oh Quoc Ngoc U have to understand that his fucking group of friends frequently go trekking and take photos and eat hotpot and take photos (networking) So theres a fucking bunch of photos HELP ME :((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( With a normal friend. This is Doan one friend I have acquainted for about 3 months, she is talking about her travel plan for Christmas. The relationship is not too close-knit hence the language is informal enough with the use of emoji but no swear words or emphatic forms: Extract 5 Doan tà ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ ¥i tà ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ º xmas nà  y Ä‘c nghà ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ ° dà  i Ä‘i 1 phà ¡t luà ´n Thao uh bà ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ n tà ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ º cÃ…Â ©ng nghà ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ ° dà  i nhÆ °ng tà ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ º cÃ…Â ©ng khà ´ng ham Ä‘i là ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¯m Doan ^^ uh Thao cà ¡c bà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¡n Ä‘i khu nà  o tà ¢y à ¢u hay Ä‘Ã ´ng à ¢u Doan tà ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ º Ä‘i Ä‘Ã ´ng à ¢u, tà ¢y à ¢u và   nam à ¢u 5 nÆ °Ãƒ ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ ºc 1 thà ¡ng luà ´n Thao mà ¡Ã‚ »-i nÆ °Ãƒ ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ ºc à ¡Ã‚ »Ã… ¸ 6 ngà  y? Doan uh Thao thà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¥y anh vià ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ ¡t đăng xin Ä‘Æ °Ãƒ ¡Ã‚ »Ã‚ £c visa phà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ §n lan thà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ ¿ là   Ä‘i phà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ §n lan trÆ °Ãƒ ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ ºc à   Doan anh vià ¡Ã‚ »Ã¢â‚¬ ¡t Ä‘i finland 1 mà ¬nh mà   =)) Doan This Xmas we have a long holiday. We travel the whole holiday. Thao Yeah we also have long Christmas holiday But Im not really interested in travel Doan ^^ yeah Thao Where are you going to travel to? Western or Eastern Europe? Doan Eastern, Western and Southern Europe 5 countries 1 month Thao 6 days per country? Doan yeah Thao I heard Mr. Viet said he had got his visa for Finland so you start your trip in Finland? Doan No, Mr. Viet travels to Finland by himself.